Get Two Certified Online Courses with 30% discount | Promo Code "Bundle30"

close icon

According to the MIT Sloan Management Review Report corporate sustainability programs grew in 2011. Two thirds of the executives surveyed have responded that CSR has been part of their strategic agenda and is more likely to remain in the preceding years. Another issue being raised is also the necessity of CSR in order to increase business competitiveness in the dynamic business environment. However, although 70% of those surveyed realize the aforementioned importance of CSR strategies in the corporate agenda, only 24% have embraced such long term strategies and a 31% has started to realize the sustainability business case but have not yet integrated it in the organizational culture.

A further interesting finding of the study is the nature of corporate motivators to embrace sustainable business strategies: Consumer preference of the offered product or service seems to be to the most highly appreciated factor, with political pressure, resource scarcity/price volatility, competitors’ sustainability programs and stricter requirements from customers along value chain following.

And while businesses need to make a decision on establishing CSR strategies, it is also important that they understand the augmented value such strategies would offer. Apart from increased, businesses can gain a great competitive advantage, develop an ideal working environment and achieve high levels of risk and reputation management.  Organizations therefore face a great challenge, now more than ever: Embrace Sustainability in their Corporate Strategy and form a solid sustainable business case.

Sustainability issues are at the forefront of corporate agendas across the world. Investors, board members and consumers are all curious as to what practices companies are using to remain sustainable.

“Twenty years ago, there were very few businesses that even knew what sustainability was,” says Bill Ford, executive chairman at Ford Motor Company told The Guardian. “If they did, they were pretty much against it. Today, you’d be hard-pressed to find a business that doesn’t understand the importance of it.”

A new survey, released by Accenture and the United Nations Global Compact, showed that 93% of CEOs realize that sustainability issues are important to the future success of the companies that they lead. Additionally. 81% of CEOs surveyed believe that sustainability issues are fully embedded into their companies’ strategy and operations, with many moving focus to their supply chains.

Are these companies really implementing processes in their everyday practices?

John Elkington, founder of SustainAbility and Volans, explained to The Guardian that while CEOs have appointed CSOs and complete annual reports, they are not looking at sustainability as a transformative agenda.

Where does your company stand on this? Do you go beyond annual reports?

Traditional risk management has extended to encompass the risks arising from climate change. What about the potential effect on production and business operations, regulatory and litigation risks and reputation risks?

Across the world, companies are addressing climate change utilizing a cross between traditional risk management and corporate sustainability efforts.

Climate change worries corporate decision makers, investors and insurers. How will the continually changing climate affect your company? Will there be a disruption to your business? Will you be impacted financially?

Investors are paying more attention to these issues more than ever. In a Ceres report, CEO of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, Anne Stausboll wrote:

In light of our long-term liabilities, we need to understand the critical risks and opportunities faced by the companies in our portfolio.

Today, that includes the serious risks — financial, physical, and reputational — associated with issues such as climate change, natural resource scarcity, supply chain pressures and other global sustainability challenges. Any company that ignores these risks, and fails to develop a long-term strategy to address them, is diminishing its competitiveness in the 21st century. At the same time, there are enormous opportunities for businesses that fully embrace sustainability.

Ceres has outlined 20 key expectations that investors have in today’s business world that include the areas of governance, stakeholder engagement, disclosure and performance.These are meant to be utilized at guidelines.

Once your company has taken to its investors, a report by Marsh recommends that companies assess their exposure tat the board level as well, “so that directors can be aware of where climate change-related risks will appear on the list of the company’s biggest risks.”

There is still a long way to go in developing processes for managing climate risk. What approaches are your companies taking?

Twitter hit 500 million member in February of 2012 and some of the users of this micro-blogging service are corporate executives.

According to Susan McPherson, senior vice president with Fenton, a public-interest communications and CSR consultancy, Twitter is well suited for those in the CSR and the sustainability arenas.

“The mantra of corporate social responsibility is transparency and open communications,” McPherson told The Guardian, “and social media channels like Twitter can lend credibility to these communications.”

CSR practitioners are using Twitter to network with their peers, promote their peers, remain up-to-date on news and trends and connect with stakeholders. Our company utilizes this medium to communicate trends in the industry as well as to disseminate information regarding our training programs.

While it’s hard to measure the value of social medial on sustainable business, it keeps consumers informed and involved with the sustainable companies they support. Utilize this forum to connect with thought leaders to expand your knowledge base or provide your consumers with up-to-date information.

Is your company’s sustainability officers on Twitter? Do you engage about sustainability on Twitter?

We do. Follow us : @CSE_Network

In today’s business world, being green is a necessity. Shareholders, investors, consumers and company employees all want to know how your organization is approaching sustainability.

Whether companies are successful at their corporate sustainability initiatives are another story. The Huffington Post’s Mark Tercek evaluated successful corporations and found that they have similar plans for success.

  1. The Chief Sustainability Officer: These inspired leaders are paving the way as key players for the development of solutions that benefit nature and business.
    These CSOs need to have a strong understanding of a company’s core operations, possess a commitment to the environment and foster strong relationships with allies. Tercek writes “a great CSO builds a true culture of sustainability across every aspect of the business, embedding environmental thinking into employees’ goals, measures and incentives.”
  2. The Eco-Advantage Mindset: When a CSO works alongside a stellar CEO who shares the commitment to making sustainability a top priority, good things happen. As a team, they take a long-range view of time frames and payoffs when they evaluate their decisions. Together, their actions remain transparent to stakeholders and the general public.
  3. Full Integration:  Strong sustainability leaders have the ability to integrate nature into core business strategies because they recognize the value of nature. Investing in long-term resources will ensure a solid position in the future.
  4. Resolution: In an ever-evolving field, there is going to be criticism. Strong sustainability leaders realize that perfect outcomes are not in the cards. Just because there are setbacks, doesn’t mean that these sustainability chiefs are going to step back from these long-term plans.

ChiefExecutive.net also brings to light that CSOs handle more than just being green. They also oversee sweatshops, workforce diversity, pay equity and community service. They serve as a resource to help overturn bad publicity.

Tags

CSR

As more companies continue to focus on sustainability and provide the public with sustainable reports, the public is still has doubts about this commitment.

According to the third annual Gibbs & Soell Sense & Sustainability Study, 21 percent of Americans believe that the majority of business are making an effort toward sustainable development.

Although this skepticism exists, 71 percent of consumers are interested in what companies are doing to to become sustainable and 75 percent believe that the media is more interested in reporting bad news.

The study looked into multiple areas, including the perceptions of a businesses’ commitment to sustainability; responsibility for sustainability initiatives; barriers to more businesses “going green;” perceptions of media coverage and content about companies “going green;” interest in learning about companies “going green;” and the impact and reach of medial coverage for related news stories.

Other key findings of the study include:

  • Thirty-four percent of executives indicated that there is no one person who is responsible for “going green.”
  • One out of five corporate leaders report that there is a team of individuals who have a job specifically dedicated to sustainability. This is an increase from 17 percent in 2011.
  • Sixty-nine percent of executive believe the media is more likely to report on bad news than good news when it comes to sustainability.
  • Newspapers dominate green news among mainstream media. A study from Cision Global Analysts found that 83 percent of coverage of comes from print and online versions of newspapers.

A new survey by Ernst & Young and GreenBiz Group has found that sustainability activities are being driven by financial considerations and other business objectives. Many companies are starting to realize that being green and being economic can go hand-in-hand.  The report, Six Growing Trends in Sustainability, addresses this concept and more.

Trend 1: Sustainability is growing, but the tools are still developing: Since CorporateRegister.com began tracking corporate responsibility reports in 1992, the number has grown from 26 to 5,593 in 2010. As the demands for accountability have increased, customers, employers, investors, shareholders, policymakers, activists, analysts and suppliers each have taken an interest in a company’s sustainability matters.

The study found that 66% of the respondents of the survey reported an increase of inquiries over the past 12 months from shareholders and investors about sustainability-related issues. To meet this demand, companies are creating sustainability reports. The majority of these reports are basic spreadsheets that include life-cycle information.

Trend 2: The CFO’s Role in Sustainability is on the Rise: The report focused on three key areas in which the CFOs are playing an increased role: investor relations, external reporting and assurance, as well as operational controllership and financial risk management.

The survey found that 65% of respondents have CFOs who have taken on an increased role in sustainability. Cost reductions and managing risks are the two key drivers of their company’s sustainability agenda.

CFOs are also more involved because of the growing scrutiny of company sustainability issues by equity analysts. Eighty percent of companies identified new revenue opportunities as a means to drive sustainability initiatives. Sixty-six percent of those surveyed have seen an increase in requests for information regarding sustainability-related issues from their investors and shareholders.

80 percent said new revenue opportunities will be driving sustainability initiatives. And 66 percent have seen an increase in inquiries about sustainability-related issues in the past 12 months from investors and shareholders. We discussed this trend in an earlier blog post.

Trend 3: Employees emerge as a key stakeholder group for sustainability programs and reporting: An interesting finding of this survey is that employees ranked ahead of shareholders and investors as the second greatest stakeholder in driving a company’s sustainability initiatives. As companies continue to engage employees on sustainability, they achieve increased attraction and retention, improved operational efficiencies; strengthened customer relations, increased innovation and strengthened community ties. 

It has also been found that companies that distribute their sustainability reports among their employees see this information shared with other external parties by their employee. Employees have a strong voice in the sustainability initiatives of their company employer.

Trend 4: Despite regulatory uncertainty, greenhouse gas reporting remains strong, with growing interest in water: Three-fourths of those surveyed have set greenhouse gas reduction goals, with 60% reporting them publicly. Companies look to release these numbers because of their reputation, their customer expectations and their efficiency goals.

The mining, oil and gas, chemicals, agriculture, power and utilities and food and beverage industries have an increased interest in reporting on water. Sixty-two percent of respondents to the survey publicly report water usage and one in six have their water footprints verified by an independent third-party.

Trend 5: Awareness is on the rise regarding the scarcity of business resources:
Companies are already recognizing resource constraints. Seventy-six percent of respondents anticipate that their core business objectives will be affected by natural resource shortages in the next three to five years. This availability is becoming a reporting requirement for companies, as many respondents have been asked about the sustainable sourcing and procurement of raw materials. Other concerns include conflict minerals,  palm oil and rare earths.

Trend 6: Rankings and ratings matter to company executives: Respondents conveyed that filling out surveys and questionnaires regarding sustainability are important. Fifty-five percent of respondents believe these responses are a primary means of communicating with investors about their performance and initiatives in this area. These respondents believe that they can make a difference at their level and look upon the following ratings and ranking with high regard: The Dow Jones Sustainability Index, The Carbon Disclosure Project’s leadership rankings, Fortune magazine’s “Most Admired Companies” list, The 100 Best Corporate Citizen, named by Corporate Responsibility magazine and Newsweek magazine’s Green Rankings.

This joint survey was conducted in late 2011, with responses from 272 sustainability executives in 24 sectors who were employed by companies with annual revenues that exceeded $1 billion. According to Forbes, about 85 percent are based in the United States.

Tags

CSR

Ceres released an analysis of 600 U.S. companies today, finding that the leadership on sustainability practices and performance has fallen short of expectations in four measured categories.

The Road to 2020: Corporate Progress on the Ceres Roadmap for Sustainability, which was conducted by Ceres and global research and analysis firm Systainalytics, found that 26 percent of companies are integrating sustainability into their governance and management systems. However, only a quarter of the these companies are disclosing supply chain monitoring and performance and only one-third have targets in place for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

This new report is the first assessment of the progress on the corporate sustainability roadmap, which was released two years ago. The how-to guide for companies to reach sustainability by the year 2020 outlined expectations in multiple categories.The Guardian explains that the roadmap is composed of 20 specific expectations companies must meet in the areas of governance, disclosure, stakeholder engagement and performance.

Ceres’ new report utilized a four-tier assessment system. Analysis showed that only a quarter of all companies surveyed ranked within the top two tiers for progress on governance, while 24 percent have some degree of meaningful stakeholder engagement.

While the overall results of the analysis are disappointing to environmental activists, there are some positive highlights in the report. Here are some companies that have seen success in their sustainability initiatives:

  • Coca-Cola: Coca-Cola has been credited with being on track to meet its goal of improving water efficiency by 20 percent by the end of 2012.
  • Nike: The shoe maker has partnered to implement a water-free fabric dyeing process.
  • Kohl’s:The retailer has achieved net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in all stores.
  • Pinnacle West: This organization is using 20 billion gallons of recycled urban wastewater per year.
  • EMC: EMC has built an energy-efficient virtual data center to move physical data to a virtualized IT infrastructure. This shift saved the company $23 million and counting.

What success has your company had?

Sustainable business and business ethics were a hot topic on the “Sustainability Evolved: Embedding ESG Performance in Corporate Valuation” panel that sponsored by The Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Sustainability and the Sustainable Practice Network.

The panel addressed how consulting firms are using ESG reports to promote long-term sustainability. This included discussions on climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, waste and recycling ratios and quantified renewable energy use.

Clearbridge Advisors’ Assistant Vice President or Environmental, Social and Governance Investment Karoline Barwinski spoke on the importance of business portfolios and how her organizations provides investment service and ESG portfolios.

“ESG is about integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into our portfolios and making sure the performance of the portfolio is comparable to traditional investing,” said Barwinski. “I hope we can come across an idea that ESG can perform and is another investment strategy and if done right, it can really work.”

While this disclosure is great, an audience member at the panel wrote in an interesting question. “The question reads, Paul McCartney said ‘If every slaughterhouse had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian.’ So the question is, is having too much disclosure a bad thing? Are some aspects of business better left in the dark?”

Each panel member agreed that full disclosure is the best method to ensure sustainability and goodwill. Companies and their investors should possess the best tools to ensure the measurement of profitability and the sustainability of their business.

But as sustainability has come to mean more than saving the environment, The Guardian’s Adrian Henriques believes that as social matters, including stability, stakeholder relationships and well-being, have become regulated, investors are looking past sustainability to the core of a company. It changes the direction of the business.

And with this change in business, companies need to look at ethics. The European Commission recently redefined CSR, recognizing that “the responsibility of a business is co-extensive with the results of its actions.”

How is your company adapting to changes in business stemming from CSR? Have you needed to address ethical issues with investors?

As companies are more increasingly monitoring the bottom-line results of social and environmental initiatives, the question is how does a company integrate these values to drive results.

Enter the Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO). This position is still a fairly new leadership role and many CSOs are given little to no guidance on how to complete the tasks at hand.

In her recent study, CSO Back Story:  How Chief Sustainability Officers Reached the C-Suite,”Ellen Weinreb observed that many CSOs have influence, but not the direct power that comes with leading a team through integrations. This raises the question of what the CSO is doing to achieve the results.

Senior Vice President and Partner of VOX Global, Tony Calando, provides some insight on how a CSO can drive increased sustainability within an organization. He writes for Triple Pundit that there are five hats a CSO must hold to be successful in implementing corporate and social responsibility within a company.

  1. Catalyst: By knowing the corporate culture and framing the business case, the CSO can more easily integrate sustainability into a business.
  2. Engineer: Change requires organizational structure. Without this structure, sustainability cannot be integrated across a company. When the CSO serves as an engineer for their organization, sustainability can be implemented at all levels.
  3. Connector: A key aspect of the CSO is to bring the outside world into an organization and to utilize this knowledge to create plan that includes the social and environmental issues that intersect with a company’s needs.
  4. Scout: Corporate social responsibility is always changing. The CSO needs to be someone who can scout out and interpret emerging trends. Not only will this enable the company to take advantage of new opportunities, but it will help avoid any risks.
  5. Collaborator: The CSO will need to collaborate across multiple initiatives in different departments across a company. As more companies are starting to include social responsibility as something important to their organization, the implementation aspect may be slow, but will be successful with patience and communication.

While the role of the CSO may be ever-changing, the person who holds this position is setting up an organization to be able serve as a competitor in tomorrow’s business world.

Tags

CSR

Group registration form


    *Please state the number of licensees you require.




    This will close in 0 seconds